THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Game Theory in Football

By Tangotiger, 11:57 AM

A look at whether teams should pass more on 1st and ten, from Ben Alamar.

The key data for those who don’t want to read the whole thing is…


... On 1st and ten, when 60 to 80 yards away from the end-zone, teams ran 50% of the time.

As a control, on the 3rd and 7 or more plays, teams passed 88% of the time.  The author reports the average yards per rush as 6.7 in the 3rd and long situation, and 4.1 for the 1st and ten, which is what you’d expect.  That is, teams are ok giving up a rush of 6 or less yards, and, knowing that teams only run 12% of the time, are willing to concede a first down on a rush every now and then.  The author doesn’t report specific numbers on the passing plays on 3rd and long, other than to say that they are not much different than the 1st and ten.  I would have preferred to see the actual numbers.

On the 1st and ten, teams got 7+ yards from the passing play 41% of the time, which seems what they get on the rushing plays as well on 3rd and 10.  That is, if it’s a given that teams will get a 1st down on 3rd and (exactly) 7 about 40% of the time, then if they get it on a pass or on a rush play each at 40%, then we are in balance (mostly).  Not totally, since 7+ yard pass will have a higher mean than a 7+ yard rush.

If the results really shows that the teams are not as successful as they should be on 1st and 10 as opposed to 3rd and 7+ on pass plays, that calls into question that maybe they don’t pass enough on the 1st down.

In football, things aren’t as clearcut, because a “state” would also include the previous play.  For example, 41% of the time, a team, following a pass play will be 2nd and 10, while following a rushing play, they will be 2nd and 10 21% of the time.  Will a team on 2nd and 10 produce the same results, regardless if the previous play was a pass or run?  I don’t know.

The entire theory of “establishing the run” is really what drives this whole game theory process.  It would be interesting to see even more data on the subject.


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 20 01:43
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 20 04:02
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 20 02:01
My 1B is better than your 1B

Nov 20 00:26
MLB logo

Nov 19 23:03
NBA’s Marcel

Nov 19 19:13
Offense by position groups by decade

Nov 19 17:32
Changes in home run rates during the Retrosheet years

Nov 19 16:40
One Year and One Million Hits Later

Nov 19 16:22
Soria as a starter?

Nov 19 13:50
Response of a fired head coach