Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Fighting leads to goals?
Phil tried and tried and tried, and was able to finally stumble on one set of parameters that MAY indicate something.
It’s not monkeys at a typewriter creating Shakespeare, but it’s close.
Buy The Book from Amazon
Phil tried and tried and tried, and was able to finally stumble on one set of parameters that MAY indicate something.
It’s not monkeys at a typewriter creating Shakespeare, but it’s close.
http://sabermetricresearch.blogspot.com/2012/01/are-more-nhl-penalties-called-in-back.html
Phil looks at penalties called in back-to-back games.
I’d like to see one other test. Since back-to-back games occur in successive days (or at most one day of rest), I’d like to see the penalty calling of games on successive days with two DIFFERENT opponents.
Perhaps the reason that fewer penalties are called is because the players are tired. (Then again, tired players may also take more stupid penalties.)
So, four categories:
day1-day2: same opponents
day1-day3: same opponents
day1-dayN: same opponents (already done)
day1-day2: different opponents
Sorry, didn’t see this until now!
I assume you want the day1-day2 different opponents to be when BOTH opponents are playing their second game in two nights?
Will add to my ‘to do’ list.
May 25 06:43
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?
May 25 06:39
Lack of hustle during a game
May 25 05:00
Help needed with sticky issue…
May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion
May 25 01:43
Neal Huntington’s best moves
May 24 23:50
Rooting for laundry
May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?
May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift
May 24 11:11
Incredible story
May 24 09:41
Racial bias in card collecting: not the collectors, but the players on the cards
Phil follows up:
http://sabermetricresearch.blogspot.com/2012/01/do-hockey-fights-lift-teams-performance_13.html