Monday, February 02, 2009
Federer v Nadal
After 4 1/2 hours, it was 174 - 173 in favor of Federer, for points, and 26-25 for Nadal in games.
Buy The Book from Amazon
After 4 1/2 hours, it was 174 - 173 in favor of Federer, for points, and 26-25 for Nadal in games.
I think the scoring system in tennis is not optimal. The vast majority of games are won by the server—as a result, most points won by the player not serving are “wasted”.
What if tennis followed the rules of table tennis? Each player would serve five times, then switch. You could play up to something like 31 points. That would be the equivalent of a set.
Then maybe have 4 out of 7 sets—I think that would be pretty similar to a current match.
Feb 11 19:12
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter
Feb 11 17:59
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential
Feb 11 17:58
Clutch analogy
Feb 11 16:48
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data? And what about outliers?
Feb 11 11:54
Who is Jeremy Lin?
Feb 11 10:29
Dwight Evans
Feb 11 02:12
Performance through the ages
Feb 10 23:01
For Your Soul
Feb 10 18:32
Moneyball at Villanova
Feb 10 17:00
Psst… wanna intern in Canada?
Does this mean we have to endure theories about Nadal’s pythag overperformance?