THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Monday, September 20, 2010

Fans Scouting Report: Another Update

By Tangotiger, 11:55 AM

Yes, I’d still like more Marlins fans.  For the fans of other teams, feel free to do the “new” players, like Cody Ross with the Gigantes.

Anyway, this is a small note to say I made a small adjustment to the calculations.  As a way to regress toward the mean, I added two ballots of all average ratings to every player.  Basically, you are not going to notice the difference to anyone, other than guys with just a handful of ballots.  A good example is Brett Carroll of the Marlins.  He had a high rating (81 or something) before the adjustment, but that was based on 6 ballots.  If I add in 2 ballots of all 50s, then that becomes 73.

IMDB also does that for their top 250 movies of all time:

weighted rating (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C

What they do is add 3000 votes of average rating (6.9).  With top movies getting 500,000 votes, obviously this is not going to matter.  You have Toy Story 3 with only 68,000 votes at a rating of 8.9.  After doing the regression (adding 3000 votes at 6.9), the new weighted score is 8.8.  (Due to rounding, they are showing it as 8.7).

http://www.tangotiger.net/scout/


#1    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/09/20 (Mon) @ 13:15

Also, 2009 has been updated with the 0-100 scale.


#2    JD      (see all posts) 2010/09/20 (Mon) @ 19:22

They might not anymore, but I thought in the past IMDB also somehow controlled for the 1 or 10 votes. the reasoning (sound, I think) is for the overexaggeration/didn’t see it, but voting anyway type of thing.

Obviously, a “1” must truly be some awful garbage. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a “1” movie outside of a one or two random low budget things. If someone’s going in and giving all the Godfather movies a “1,” I think IMDB’s system accounts for that. At least they claimed to at one point.

Just wondering, but do you do any kind of control? If a person gives, say, all Cubs players great fielding ratings and all Cardinals players beyond terrible ratings, do you do anything in that case?


#3    tangotiger      (see all posts) 2010/09/20 (Mon) @ 20:43

JD: all I’ll say is that I do a pretty good job of figuring out crappy votes.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 05:00
Help needed with sticky issue…

May 25 04:38
The first time a pitcher has ever intentionally thrown at a batter….

May 25 03:39
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 02:54
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

May 25 01:43
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 23:50
Rooting for laundry

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story