THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Friday, August 11, 2006

Edmonds, and the decline against lefties

By Tangotiger, 02:37 PM

This article discusses an old aging ballplayer whining about not being paid out his lottery ticket next year.

A 10 million$ contact against a 3 million$ buyout.  So, do you pay him the extra 7 million$?  He just has to be about 3 wins above replacement, meaning 1 win above average in full-time play.  Seems like a lock, unless the injury has changed his talent level.  Or…


What I’d like to know more of is on the aging pattern of players against the handedness of the pitcher.  Just as a pure gut thing, I tend to believe that the same-side performance would decline faster than the opposite-side performance.  Guys are getting old, so they start to adjust.  We know they walk more year after year, likely the combination of wisdom and receding talent.  They pick their spots, and hope.  Maybe they get outmatched much faster against same-side pitching?

I don’t have a study here for you.  I’m hoping someone else out there has one.

#1    MGL      (see all posts) 2006/08/11 (Fri) @ 17:26

Interesting study to do.  My guess would be that the two curves would be similar if not the same.

Edmonds has been one of the best players in baseball for many years now and despite his “name,” has been underrated.  I would think that he would be well worth the 7 mil next year.  I don’t know that you can ever “predict” a large drop-off in production for any player.  I think you always have to use their weighted Marcel adjusted for age.

I have been actually lobbying to trade him for several years now despite his great production.  I think that at one time, the Cardinals could have gotten a boatload of talent for him.  Not anymore though.  He is probably considered damaged goods.

One of the best strategies for a team is to take a highly paid great player with a great reputation and trade him for lots of good young players and prospects.  Other teams tend to overvalue good and great players in relation to their contracts.  For example, Jeter is montrously overpaid, yet there are probably a few teams who would love to acquire his contract AND give away lots of talent.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 20 01:43
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 20 04:02
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 20 02:01
My 1B is better than your 1B

Nov 20 00:26
MLB logo

Nov 19 23:03
NBA’s Marcel

Nov 19 19:13
Offense by position groups by decade

Nov 19 17:32
Changes in home run rates during the Retrosheet years

Nov 19 16:40
One Year and One Million Hits Later

Nov 19 16:22
Soria as a starter?

Nov 19 13:50
Response of a fired head coach