THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Deadening balls

By Tangotiger, 04:04 PM

Wonderful stuff:

Digging a little further revealed a turning point for this NL homer rate in ’67:

April 2.56%
May 2.64%
June 2.99%
July 2.60%

August 1.82%
Sept/Oct 1.89%

Wow. That looks to me like something happened to dramatically reduce homers either at the beginning of August that season or somewhere in the back end of July.

In 1968, that low rate resumed:

1st half: 1.94%
2nd half: 1.95%
April 2.37%
May 1.69%
June 2.04%
July 1.72%
August 2.03%
Sept/Oct 2.00%

And the possible cause:

“Rawlings had ... six manufacturing plants--four in Missouri and two in Puerto Rico--when it was sold in 1967 to Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America. This conglomerate made the company a division under its prior Rawlings Sporting Goods name.”

It seems a remarkable coincidence that a change in home run rates should come in the same year that the ball manufacturer changes ownership.


SabermetricsHistoryParks
#1    Greg Rybarczyk      (see all posts) 2011/03/17 (Thu) @ 16:32

It’s important to consider the supply chain here: balls used in August, 1967 would almost certainly have been made some time earlier than that, and it’s no guarantee that balls used in August, 1967 were made at a different time than those used in July, 1967. 

Nevertheless, it’s an interesting theory, I hope someone can shed more light on the manufacturing process and the supply chain / chain of custody from factory to ball field, so we can take this beyond speculation…


#2    MGL      (see all posts) 2011/03/18 (Fri) @ 00:20

I think there is little doubt that the resiliency (and other characteristics) of the ball changes from time to time for whatever reasons, resulting in changes in HR rate and run scoring overall.  As I have mentioned many times, there are also many other things that do the same, not the least of which is the wildly varying pool of pitching and hitting talent from year to year…


#3          (see all posts) 2011/03/18 (Fri) @ 02:24

I do not think Rawlings became the exclusive ball provider until 1977, but if they provided a large percentage of MLB balls, any changes to their balls could affect the overall rates.  HR rates changed drastically around 1977, and in 1987 when Rawlings shifted production from Haiti to Costa Rica.

#1 “and it’s no guarantee that balls used in August, 1967 were made at a different time than those used in July, 1967.”

Well, maufacturing is a continuous process.  I doubt all of the balls needed for a given season are made at one time, in one lot with an identical batch of raw material, and at the same factory.  I am sure balls are shipped on a lot by lot basis from the different factories.  It’s very likely balls used in August come from different lots than balls used earlier in the season.  You would be surprised at what can go wrong and go undetected (or even covered up if it is detected and shipped anyways). 

How little or how much variation there are in the finished balls from lot to lot depends on the factories QC, how well they control quality of incoming raw materials and manufacturing processes. 

I could see a scenario where new owners might want to seek lower cost raw materials, or shift more of their production to Puerto Rico, with fewer balls made in the US.  I doubt MLB had very tight QC on balls received, and the specs are so broad that balls within spec could have drastically different COR’s. 

If the weather was unusually humid across the country in the latter part of 1967 and 1968 then perhaps it was more of a conditioning problem, and nothing to do with manufacturing. But any changes to manufacturers ownership or changes in factories used should be suspect. 

#2 “wildly varying pool of pitching and hitting talent from year to year”.  I suppose there is evidence for that assertion, and a definition for “wildly varying”.


#4    MGL      (see all posts) 2011/03/18 (Fri) @ 03:26

“#2 “wildly varying pool of pitching and hitting talent from year to year”.

I suppose there is evidence for that assertion, and a definition for “wildly varying”.

No, I’m just talking out of my ass like I usually do.  And you can make up your own definition of “wildly varying.”

http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/comments/why_you_really_need_to_know_the_league_changes_from_year_to_year/


#5    stevebogus      (see all posts) 2011/03/18 (Fri) @ 15:26

Spalding owned Rawlings from the 1950s until they were forced to sell the company sometime in the 1960s due to a court antitrust ruling. I have seen a different dates on the sale.

Spalding was also the owner of the Reach company, which supplied the official AL baseballs before Rawlings. The shift was probably a case of Spalding phasing out the Reach brand and supporting the newer acquisition.

Reach actually manufactured the Spalding baseballs that were used in the National League. the only thing different was the cover, which (I believe) was applied by Spalding. I’ve seen differing info on this. Some sources say the only thing different was the logo that was stamped on the ball. However, in the 1930s Spalding changed the thickness of the cover on the NL ball a few times, and I think NL baseballs had higher seams. Both would indicate that Spalding was taking the “unfinished” baseballs and applying the entire cover. I don’t know what Spalding did after acquiring Rawlings. Did they keep the old Reach plant in operation or shift to Rawlings-made baseballs?


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 05:00
Help needed with sticky issue…

May 25 04:38
The first time a pitcher has ever intentionally thrown at a batter….

May 25 03:39
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 02:54
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

May 25 01:43
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 23:50
Rooting for laundry

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story