Wednesday, March 03, 2010
Chico Harlan
Great story.
I seem to remember linking to Harlan. Didn’t he reference WPA and stuff?
Buy The Book from Amazon
Great story.
I seem to remember linking to Harlan. Didn’t he reference WPA and stuff?
It seems to me that this is an argument for a change in how sports are covered. Papers could save money and still serve their readers with pool coverage for recaps and postgame quotes and such, and their “beat” reporters should be blogger/columnists. Let them become experts on the team and take on a columnist’s perspective with a columnist’s standards, with the expectation that they’ll still wear a journalist’s hat at all times, ready to break news when they find it.
Reduce the admin and pay the specialists for specialized work.
Feb 11 17:58
Clutch analogy
Feb 11 16:48
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data? And what about outliers?
Feb 11 15:58
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential
Feb 11 11:54
Who is Jeremy Lin?
Feb 11 10:29
Dwight Evans
Feb 11 02:12
Performance through the ages
Feb 10 23:01
For Your Soul
Feb 10 21:07
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter
Feb 10 18:32
Moneyball at Villanova
Feb 10 17:00
Psst… wanna intern in Canada?
When I was a teenaged boy, in the 1970s, I too wanted to be a sportswriter. However, once I left home for university, I decided I didn’t want to be a sportswriter. I still wanted work in publishing, but not as a sportswriter.
I don’t think I actually knew at the time, but some sixth sense warned me that one would have to conceal lots of interesting stuff because otherwise there would be a loss of access to sources. Such self-censorship was not appealing.
A friend of mine did become a sports journalist, although not a reporter. He knows a lot more than he can let on, and consequently is a very boring person to talk to.