THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Chance of scoring from any base/out

By Tangotiger, 07:36 PM

If you are looking for a quick equation:

chance of scoring
= 0.086
* (base + 0.5)
* (3 - outs)

This gives you:

Base   Outs   ChanceScoring
1    0     0.39 
1    1     0.26 
1    2     0.13 

2    0     0.65 
2    1     0.43 
2    2     0.22 

3    0     0.90 
3    1     0.60 
3    2     0.30

Close enough to reality for something quick that you need.

If someone wants to come up with something more robust, then play around with those arbitrary coefficients, and post your results!

If you want the actual data.


#1          (see all posts) 2011/10/20 (Thu) @ 20:21

Did you run a regression analysis to generate that equation?


#2          (see all posts) 2011/10/20 (Thu) @ 21:28

I wonder what an equation of the chance of scoring on a hit to the outfield would be.


#3    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2011/10/20 (Thu) @ 21:48

MGL, I saw the pattern, and I just ran a regression to get the coefficient .086.


#4    mettle      (see all posts) 2011/10/21 (Fri) @ 01:40

Well:

.163 + .233 x base - .05 x outs -.074 x base x outs gives you a sum of squares of 7x10-3 while yours gives 12x10-3.
Less clean, more accurate:

OUTS base rate ME SS_ME TT SS_TT
0 0 0.167 0.163 0.000016 0.13 0.001369
1 0 0.12 0.113 4.9E-05 0.09 0.0009
2 0 0.07 0.063 4.9E-05 0.043 0.000729
0 1 0.397 0.396 0.000001 0.39 4.9E-05
1 1 0.266 0.272 3.6E-05 0.26 3.6E-05
2 1 0.132 0.148 0.000256 0.13 4E-06
0 2 0.614 0.629 0.000225 0.65 0.001296
1 2 0.417 0.431 0.000196 0.43 0.000169
2 2 0.232 0.233 1E-06 0.22 0.000144
0 3 0.842 0.862 0.0004 0.9 0.003364
1 3 0.663 0.59 0.005329 0.6 0.003969
2 3 0.292 0.318 0.000676 0.3 6.4E-05
0.007234 0.012093

This includes the 0base state from your data.
Without that, coefficients are:
.151, .238, -.057, -.071


#5    Highland Cow      (see all posts) 2011/10/21 (Fri) @ 12:39

Why is 1999 excluded?


#6    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2011/10/21 (Fri) @ 13:26

At the time I ran it, that data was not available.


#7    BirdWatcher      (see all posts) 2011/10/21 (Fri) @ 15:11

To make it easier to do this calculation in your head while watching a ball game, use 0.1 instead of .086, then mutiply the overall result by 0.9. Hey, it’s so easy, even Tony Larussa could figure out the answer !


#8    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2011/10/21 (Fri) @ 15:32

Personally, I just remember the base numbers with 2 outs: .13, .22, .30.  And then if there is 1 out, I double it.  If there are 2 outs, I triple it.


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

May 25 03:39
Lack of hustle during a game

May 25 02:54
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 25 02:38
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

May 25 01:43
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 25 00:36
Help needed with sticky issue…

May 24 23:50
Rooting for laundry

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story

May 24 09:41
Racial bias in card collecting: not the collectors, but the players on the cards