Saturday, December 29, 2007
Bad Running
Dan Fox shows us that Wade Boggs may have been the least successful baserunner of our lifetime. Biggio and Molitor have reached base as often as Wade Boggs in their career, yet have managed to score around 300 runs each, more than Boggs. The 150 extra HR helps. But, it certainly can’t explain it all. Boggs’ baserunning explains the rest. To put another way, Boggs has reached base almost 500 more times than Raines, yet has scored less runs than Raines did. Yowza. The average Raines’ hits and walks are worth more than the average of Boggs’. Boggs’ 3010 hits have some “emptiness” to them.
By the way, Rice/Boggs would be a good candidate for “With or Without You” for GIDP.
Great work and an important area for future research. I have long thought that components of performance with a potential career impact of five or more wins for players with long careers are worth analyzing intensively.
I have also long wondered how Boggs failed to score a lot more runs than he did--super high OBP, generally powerful offenses behind him. I wouldn’t be surprised if Runs Produced [(R + RBI - HR)/(AB/10)] compared to Base Runs wouldn’t also show similar results.
Tom--read your article in this year’s Hardball Times Annual--terrific and very, very valuable, particularly for fielders with short careers or lots of part-time play.
I was wondering whether With You or Without You might yield up the current holy grail of first base fielding--measuring infielder throwing errors prevented.