THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Are the Yankees trying to hit more fly balls?

By Tangotiger, 04:58 PM

Pat presents partial data:

Below are some of your 2009 New York Yankees, accompanied by their 2009 FB%, their 2008 FB%, and where this season’s FB% ranks along with how many seasons the data has been available for.

Player

Mark Teixeira: 45.1%, 36.5%, 1/7
Derek Jeter: 26%, 23.8%, 2/8
Jorge Posada: 43.2%, 39.7%, 1/8
Johnny Damon: 44.6%, 34.2% , 1/8
Hideki Matsui: 42%, 34.5%, 2/7
Nick Swisher: 44.8%, 44.5%, 4/6
Jose Molina: 41%, 33%, 1/8

It’s better to show all the data when you do stuff like this.


#1          (see all posts) 2009/08/19 (Wed) @ 17:47

Good point, Tom. I updated my post over at THT Live (I’m still getting used to the formatting there so hopefully I can make the numbers look neater), and I put this:

“UPDATE: The great Tom Tango, over at his The Book Blog, wrote that I should include all the data when doing something like this. I agree, and I assume he meant to include all the Yankees, so I’ll include the rest of the starters/players with enough service time for the numbers to mean anything, and update the list to include the player’s career FB%, which is right after last year’s mark.”

I assumed this is what you had meant, and if not let me know. If I included the GB and LD rates without the table the whole thing would go to hell.


#2          (see all posts) 2009/08/19 (Wed) @ 21:19

Updated it further for neatness/adding some more data.


#3    Tangotiger      (see all posts) 2009/08/19 (Wed) @ 21:47

Great stuff.  That’s an average of around +4% more FB per BIP at a team level, which must be enormous.

I would guess, total guess, that 99% of all players with at least say 400 BIP would be +/-5% year-to-year.  I’ll further guess that all teams would be +/-2%.  So, when I see a team level change of 4%, that definitely seems to imply something.

If it’s a question of players responding to the perceived expectation of the park, it would be interesting to see if this change happened at a particular moment.  Remember, FB/BIP is a very telling stat that quickly shows real changes in talent.

Great work!


Page 1 of 1 pages


Name (required)
E-Mail (optional; WILL be published)
Website (optional)

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Feb 12 05:18
Reader Mail of the Day: Why do we need X years of fielding data?  And what about outliers?

Feb 12 04:55
Who is Jeremy Lin?

Feb 12 03:15
New PECOTA

Feb 12 02:42
Whitney Houston

Feb 12 02:23
Psst… wanna intern in Canada?

Feb 12 00:40
Clutch analogy

Feb 11 20:11
Fighting leads to goals?

Feb 11 19:55
Why do players get crappy caps?

Feb 11 19:12
Hero of the month: Brittney Baxter

Feb 11 17:59
MGL: Today on Clubhouse Confidential