THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Thursday, December 01, 2011

CBA: Are the Cardinals a small-market team?

By Tangotiger, 03:53 PM

As I linked to the other day, the Cardinals are one of the teams that qualifies for the lottery pick.  The qualification is to either have a low-revenue team or a small-market team.  Revenue is easy enough to calculate, and the Cardinals are comfortably in the top-half there (not bottom 10 as required).  That implies they are considered a small-market team.  We see from this old Zumsteg article that the Cards are 7th smallest in terms of “MSA”.  But what we really care about is the size of the population times the affinity for that product or service.  That’s the true market.  Keith Woolner came up with one such method, and the Cards came out to an obvious non-small-market team.

We can also use a simple method I have here, that calculates the “base attendance” for each team (attendance you’d expect if the team played .500).  It’s based on its past attendance.  Theoretically, we can derive an “affinity index” by comparing the attendance to its population size, so that we can do what Woolner does: multiply the affinity index by the population index.  In any case, I have the Cards as the 8th largest baseball market.

So, it’s quite surprising that:
a. the CBA has been negotiated to allow the Cards to be considered a small market
b. the other teams not griping about this

One interesting one in comparing Woolner’s to my list is the Diamondbacks.  Arizona has attracted plenty of people to their park, but Woolner considers them a very small market.  Since Zumsteg has them at just below-average in market size, Woolner must have given them a below-average affinity index in order to get them as a small-market.

In any case, I would have hoped that something more than simply population size would have been used, and given the creativity MLB and MLBPA have shown in other facets, it’s odd that it was left as it was.  I’m all in favor of the sniff test, and the Cardinals as a small market is not one that passes that test.

(39) Comments • 2011/12/04 • SabermetricsMLB_Management
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 24 21:30
Help needed with sticky issue…

May 24 20:16
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 24 17:50
Rooting for laundry

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 14:09
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story

May 24 09:41
Racial bias in card collecting: not the collectors, but the players on the cards

May 24 08:13
espnW for hockey: CBC’s WhileTheMenWatch.com

May 24 00:16
Psst… wanna intern… somewhere?

THREADS

December 01, 2011
CBA: Are the Cardinals a small-market team?