THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Monday, September 12, 2011

Cain v Shields, part 2

By Tangotiger, 09:37 AM

In the off-season, I noted the similarity and differences of Cain and Shields.  They both had a similar FIP entering 2011, but Cain had a much better BABIP, and sequenced his events better, hence Cain allowed runs at a much lower rate than Shields.

This is why god invented the bet.  If you really believed that there is in essence no difference in overall talent between Shields and Cain, then you should be taking bets to that effect, that Cain and Shields are expected to be on the mound a similar number of times when runs are scored.  But, if you believe that Cain is in fact more talented in getting positive outcomes when the ball is in play, and/or Cain is in fact more talented in stringing events to minimize their impact to run scoring, then you should be taking bets to that effect.

So, how’s 2011 been treating them?  They’ve both faced a similar number of batters (825 for Cain, 850 for Shields).  Both have the same number of walks (excluding IBB, including HBP: one has 57, the other has 58).  Cain has 41 fewer K, but he also has 13 fewer HR.  The result is that Cain has a much lower FIP.

As for Cain’s BABIP: he continues to maintain his very low BABIP, as he’s at .260 (compared to his career .265).  Shields however matches him at .261 (compared to career .300).

However, the real test in all these things is runs allowed.  Remember: betting on FIP entering 2011 meant that you’d bet them to be about equals.  Betting on also including BABIP and sequencing would mean that you’d bet on Cain.  So, how did the test go?  How many runs have they allowed?

Shields has allowed 72 runs, while Cain has allowed 73. 

So, in a weird way, betting on FIP was right.  Except of course that the individual components to those runs allowed is not what we were trying to sell.  We thought Cain’s BABIP would increase, except Cain maintained his superlow level, and Shields met him there.  We thought their FIP would remain the same, but Cain crushed him by simply not allowing HR.

(2) Comments • 2012/04/02 • SabermetricsPitchers
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 24 21:30
Help needed with sticky issue…

May 24 20:16
Largest demonstration in Canadian history?

May 24 17:50
Rooting for laundry

May 24 17:04
Firefox, IE, or Chrome?

May 24 14:09
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story

May 24 09:41
Racial bias in card collecting: not the collectors, but the players on the cards

May 24 08:13
espnW for hockey: CBC’s WhileTheMenWatch.com

May 24 00:16
Psst… wanna intern… somewhere?

THREADS

September 12, 2011
Cain v Shields, part 2