Friday, April 22, 2011
Bayes and regression, again
Great post from Kincaid.
Note: a better estimate than .050 as the spread in talent is .060. That’s why I use 69 games as the regression amount equal to 50%. (Kincaid’s example, using .050 as the spread, implies 100 games as the regression amount.)
One easy way to test that 69 is a better number than 100 is to simply take games #1, 3, 5… 137 for each team in pool1, and games 2, 4, 6… 138 in pool2, and run a correlation. You should get r=.50.


Recent comments
Older comments
Page 1 of 344 pages 1 2 3 > Last »Complete Archive – By Category
Complete Archive – By Date