THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

Filter posts by...

 

Monday, March 22, 2010

Batted Ball FIP chart

By Tangotiger, 09:37 AM

Rich is so close to representing Batted Ball FIP as a chart.  He took the necessary first step as doing K minus BB.  But, he keeps GB/BIP as the other term.  By doing GB/BIP, it’s the exact same thing as doing (1-GB)/BIP.  And 1-GB is outfield FB plus infield FB plus line drive.

As we know from MGL’s DIPS Primer from several years back, and reiterated with SIERA recently, the frequency of line drives is not very persistent pitcher-to-pitcher (in MLB).  The reason should be clear: if you give up alot of line drives, you will be weeded out of MLB!  Basically, you and me won’t make it to MLB, because at least 50% of the batted balls would be line drives.  85% of MLB pitchers give up line drives at the 18%-22% level in their careers.  Even the pitcher with the most line-drive preventing skill (Derek Lowe) gives up 16% line drives, and he’s only that low because of his excessively high GB rate. That is, the low correlation is not an indication of a lack of skill, but an indication that at the MLB level, there is not much variation in that skill.

What can Rich do?  Well, he can do what Batted Ball FIP does, and make it GB-ofFB per BIP.  What this does is distribute the line drives and infield flies evenly to GB and FB.  For example, say you have this:
GB: 40%
ofFB: 30%
LD: 20%
ifFB: 10%

This will give you the same thing as:
GB: 45%
ofFB: 35%
LD: 10%
ifFB: 10%

That is, the GB minus ofFB is 10% in either case.  It’s an acceptance that the line drive doesn’t affect either one.  Now, the only question is if you should do GB minus ofFB or GB minus ofFB+ifFB.  There is a high correlation between ofFB + ifFB.  So, SIERA takes the position that you should simply lump them into FB.  At the same time, there is a huge run difference between an ofFB (about +.05 runs) and an ifFB (about -.30 runs) that it would be understandable to keep them separate, as I (currently) do.  I still haven’t decided whether to keep them together or not, though currently, I’m keeping them separate.

So, to Rich, I recommend that you do GB minus FB, and you can decide whether FB includes or excludes pop ups.

(4) Comments • 2010/03/27 • SabermetricsBatted_Ball
Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest...

COMMENTS

May 24 16:24
Rooting for laundry

May 24 14:09
Neal Huntington’s best moves

May 24 13:14
Help needed with sticky issue…

May 24 12:07
How to beat the shift

May 24 11:11
Incredible story

May 24 09:41
Racial bias in card collecting: not the collectors, but the players on the cards

May 24 08:13
espnW for hockey: CBC’s WhileTheMenWatch.com

May 24 00:16
Psst… wanna intern… somewhere?

May 23 23:33
Inertia of player safety

May 23 22:11
NFLPA lawsuit against collusion

THREADS

March 22, 2010
Batted Ball FIP chart