THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Reader Mail of the Day: Environment impacting events

Tom

Maybe you saw this article.

A Labor Market (and Baseball) Mystery
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/a-labor-market-and-baseball-mystery/

It quotes an economist saying:

“Doubles and home runs are disproportionately valuable in high scoring environments than low scoring environments, because their runner-advancing potential is greater when there are more runners on base. In a high-scoring, a home run is more likely to score other runners, and someone who hits a double is less likely to be stranded on second base.”

But if I look at

http://www.tangotiger.net/customlwts.html

It looks the opposite. Any thoughts on this? I think you had a site once that had them year by year, too, but I can’t find it.

If someone wants to know what they are talking about with regards to run-environments, you absolutely must be using this link at all times:
http://tangotiger.net/markov.html

If you are someone who has never used that link, go there.  If you are someone that went there and dismissed it, go back.  That link provides the basis for everything about baseball.  It is that important.

If you want a more theoretical answer, the run value of a HR is the EXTRA runs he adds to the runners already on base.  If the team OBP is .999, then guess what: the HR is barely more valuable than a walk.  If the team OBP is .001, then guess what: the walk is almost useless and the HR is the most valuable thing you can have, by far.  So it works like this:
1. Figure out the chance that the average runner will score on an average event… say that’s 30%
2. Figure out the number of runners on base on average… say that’s 0.60
3. Do the math: HR will add .70 runs to each baserunner times the 0.60 baserunners, or +.42 runs of base-advancing value for the HR

Now, suppose you have a different run environment, one where say the chance that the average runner will score is 40%, and that you have alot of runners, say 0.70 runners on base.  Now, you are adding only .60 runs to each baserunner times the .70 runners on base, or.... +.42 runs of base-advancing value for the HR.

Pretty much, for OBP in the .250 to .400 range, the run value of the HR is fairly constant.  And that is its peak more or less.  At somewhere below .200 OBP and above .600 OBP (or something), the run value of the HR dips toward the same value once OBP approaches 0 or approached 1.

Refresher for everyone: http://tangotiger.net/rc3.html


(5) Comments • 2010/06/22 • SabermetricsLinear_Weights
Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to main