THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews

Buy The Book from Amazon


SABR101 required reading if you enter this site. Check out the Sabermetric Wiki. And interesting baseball books.
MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Friday, June 05, 2009

Linear Weights by Strike Zone

Max is at it again.  Here’s one of his many charts, which focuses on the horizontal location of the curve ball, and what its run value is:

The smaller the number (the more toward the left), the better for the pitcher.  So, if the pitcher is looking for a 10-inch vertical zone to throw his curve ball, he should throw it in the center.  But if he does that, his margin of error is very very small at the top end.  If you expand that to a 20-inch vertical zone, then it’s a bit above the center, to below the knees (outside the strike zone).  The “hanging” curve ball that is often mentioned (a strike, but hitting the top of the strike zone) is equivalent to throwing a curve ball halfway between the knees and the ground.  That’s how bad it is to hang one.

By the way, those run values don’t make any sense to me.  The average run value of a called ball is something like +.08 runs (and the called or swing-and-miss strike as well, but negative).  But, a curve ball thrown right in the dirt, according to Max’s chart, is worth +.02 runs.  This means that batters must be swinging at ALOT of curve balls in the dirt, something like 35% of the time.  Doesn’t sound right at all.


(8) Comments • 2009/06/05 • SabermetricsBall_Tracking
Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to main