THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Monday, July 21, 2008

Late-inning fielding replacement

By Tangotiger, 11:04 AM

I know I wrote a post on how to figure out if a late-inning substitution, trading offense for defense, makes sense.  From what I remember figuring out, if you are trading one extreme for another extreme, then you should do it in the 9th, maybe in the 8th, and definitely not in the 7th or earlier.

If someone can point me to what I wrote, I’d appreciate it.  I don’t want to bother redoing everything I did.

UPDATE: I’ll just rewrite what I think below:


The difference between a great fielder and a bad fielder is roughly .27 runs per game, or .03 runs per inning.

The difference between a great hitter and a bad hitter (at the same position) is roughly 50% higher than that, or say .43 runs per game, or .10 runs per PA.

If you replace someone for one inning for defensive purposes, you do it.  Of course, we don’t know that it will be for only one inning, since extra innings are always a possibility.

If you replace someone for two innings, then it starts to get dicey.  If you are replacing the game who made the last out in the 7th, then there’s a good chance that he won’t come up in the 9th.  I’ll guess the odds as around 50/50.  And if he does come up, chances are that means you scored more runs on the board.  So, for two innings, you get +.06 potential runs with the glove against a 50% chance of losing .10 runs at a likely lower level leverage.

For 3 innings, it starts to get dicey.  You get +.09 runs with the glove, and you lose .10 runs with the bat.

So, does it make sense to replace a guy in the 8th, or even the 7th inning?  Well, it depends.  It depends on exactly who the players are, when is the replacement due up, and what the leverage is, and expected to be.

Even if the manager limits it to the 9th inning only, and he does it with players of extreme and opposite ability in off/def, and he does it 30-40 times a year, that’s a total gain of +1 run.

For such an extreme tradeoff, to get one run in this deal, I have to question the idea of even having a “defensive specialist” on hand for such situations, when the “defensive specialist” I would like would be another guy in the bullpen so that I can get my below-average starters out of there after 4 or 5 innings.

(7) Comments • 2008/07/28 • SabermetricsIn-game_Strategy
Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 21 17:29
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 22 03:44
The New Triple Crown

Nov 22 02:48
How good are the Fans in evaluating fielding?

Nov 21 20:13
Runs Produced

Nov 21 19:27
Marcel 2009 is here

Nov 21 16:43
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 21 10:57
New BBTN

Nov 20 20:34
ABSO-lutely… not!

Nov 20 19:23
R.I.P. Tom Boswell, sabermetrician; P.A.L.L.(*) Tom Boswell, human being

Nov 20 18:06
Top Free Agent Pitchers