THE BOOK cover
The Unwritten Book is Finally Written!
An in-depth analysis of: The sacrifice bunt, batter/pitcher matchups, the intentional base on balls, optimizing a batting lineup, hot and cold streaks, clutch performance, platooning strategies, and much more.
Read Excerpts & Customer Reviews
If you are a media member and would like a review copy of The Book, please contact Kevin Cuddihy of Potomac Books.

Buy The Book from Amazon

MOST RECENT ARTICLES
MAIL : You ask | We say

Advanced


THE BOOK--Playing The Percentages In Baseball

<< Back to main

Monday, July 24, 2006

62 to go

By Tangotiger, 02:51 PM

Would you prefer to be a worse team, but by good luck be ahead in the standings, or a better team, but by bad luck be behind in the standings?


Let’s start off with a simple simulation, where 100 games have already been played, and there is 62 to go.  We have a four-team division, and all four teams are equals, and are currently at .500.  Running 10,000 simulations, our four totally equal teams won or tied for the lead this often:
Team1 Team2 Team3 Team4
28.6% 28.4% 28.9% 28.1%

As you can see, even with 10,000 simulations, things don’t even out.  But, the results are pretty close.

Now, let’s have some fun.  Let’s make each team a true .500 team, but by good and bad luck, the current standings show:
Team 1 --
Team 2 -1
Team 3 -2
Team 4 -3

It’s a tight group.  How badly off is team 4?  3 behind the lead, 62 games to go, but two other teams in the way.

Team1 Team2 Team3 Team4
42.9% 31.7% 22.8% 15.7%

Quite a difference!  Essentially, each team has 70% the chance of the team above it.  All because of a single game.

So far, we’ve assumed that all four teams are in fact equals in talent, and the standings were just a matter of a break here and there.  Let’s take the flip-side: let’s make all four teams tied in the standings after 100 games, but make them unequals in talent.  What kind of talent level does each team have to have to match the above percentages?

If I give the four teams this true talent level:
Team1 Team2 Team3 Team4
0.545 0.530 0.515 0.500

And start them all at .500, this is how often they’ll win or tie for the division lead:

Team1 Team2 Team3 Team4
42.0% 31.7% 23.3% 16.3%

And finally, let’s merge the two.  Let’s have these true talent teams, with the following games behind the leader:

Team1 Team2 Team3 Team4
0.550 0.533 0.517 0.500
-3.......-2.......-1.......0

Team1 Team2 Team3 Team4
28.2% 28.8% 28.4% 28.8%

What this shows is that a really good team (.550 compared to a .500), but who find themselves three games behind that lucky team, has an even shot at the title.  This is kind of like when you run against your big brother, and he gives you a 10-metre head start.

(5) Comments • 2006/07/26 • SabermetricsForecasting
Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to main


Latest...

COMMENTS

Nov 20 19:19
Sabermetric Moves of the 2009 Pre-Season

Nov 21 07:51
Nate Silver: hero to interviewers

Nov 20 20:34
ABSO-lutely… not!

Nov 20 19:23
R.I.P. Tom Boswell, sabermetrician; P.A.L.L.(*) Tom Boswell, human being

Nov 20 18:06
Top Free Agent Pitchers

Nov 20 17:45
NBA’s Marcel

Nov 20 15:44
Marcel 2009 is here

Nov 20 15:24
Ball the vote

Nov 20 15:07
New BBTN

Nov 20 15:06
David G. checks in again on whether experience matters in the post-season